Season 4, Episode 15 (#117 overall)
Cayuga Production # 4854
Originally aired April 18, 1963
50 years ago tonight, yet another of The Twilight Zone’s nostalgic misfits found himself visiting his own idealized past. No, it’s not last week’s episode all over again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fdfe/4fdfea43d7d53d5bdd54144269d7d7a8db0a2622" alt=""
A gang of kids runs by, one of whom bumps into him and knocks his pocket watch out of his hands. The boy smiles at him before running off, and Horace recognizes him as Hermy Brandt, a kid he knew as a youth, impossibly still a child. Horace, understandably freaked out, gets the hell out of there. Later that night, Horace’s wife answers the doorbell: it’s Hermy, who hands her the pocket watch and smiles, “He dropped this.”
It’s a pretty obvious hook to get him to return to Randolph Street… which he does. He won’t like what he finds, though, as time has a tough lesson to teach him.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71576/71576956b3659b695a272a62f475d78b3b2953e8" alt=""
Hey kids! If you've ever had difficulty making paper airplanes (like yours truly), we’re given a very useful step-by-step close up of Horace doing just that at the end of the prologue.
And I’m not sure it’s an actual Forbidden Planet connection, but Horace’s robot toy design looks, at least from the waist down, an awful lot like Robby the Robot.
Is it just me, or does there seem to be a little something-something going on between Horace's wife Laura and Leonard, his coworker at the toy company? Watch as he stares intently at her with the burning gaze of unrequited passion, and gasp in shock as he basically paws the hell out of her, never mind that her husband is in the next office over.
Down with O.P.P.? Yeah, you know me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d66e7/d66e7cff48c96cb2f64833c9e59940eac1a1b63a" alt=""
Nan Martin is fine as Laura in her only classic TZ appearance (I’m undecided if she qualifies as a TZ babe; she’s not bad looking, though….). She’d return to The Twilight Zone for two appearances (“If She Dies” and “A Saucer of Loneliness”) in the 1985-1987 revival series on CBS.
We last saw Phillip Pine (Leonard) playing Virgil Sterig, one of Arch Hammer’s alternate faces, in season one’s “The Four of Us Are Dying.” He also plays a pivotal role in the “Hundred Days of the Dragon” episode of The Outer Limits as Vice President Ted Pearson.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2288/a2288d0dfb0c6d87960a68741f5965f928b5ab84" alt=""
“The Incredible World of Horace Ford” is yet another stock-scored episode with disparate cues by multiple composers, including Rene Garriguenc, Lyn Murray, Fred Steiner, Nathan Van Cleave and, most significantly, Bernard Herrmann. Herrmann’s “Walking Distance” evokes the sweet ache of nostalgia, so it fits in quite well here (as it did in season three’s “Kick the Can”).
"The Incredible World of Horace Ford” is decent, but it would undoubtedly be more effective as a half-hour episode. Horace goes back to the same moment in time on Randolph Street three different times, stretching the proceedings out into three stages instead of one. Martin Sloan, meanwhile, learned his lesson in a single trip and that, ladies and gentlemen, is the power of the half-hour format.
Ha! Suck it, Horace!
Two weeks from tonight:
A bunch more Forbidden Planet eye candy but, more importantly, a great episode.
2 comments:
This episode is a bit problematic for me, in that I appreciate the concept, but I find the execution of the idea sadly lacking. And it all comes down to what I think is a terrible performance by the title character.
The script really isn’t the problem; it’s the way Horace is portrayed by Pat Hingle. I like the story, but man, a more irritating and annoying character would be difficult to imagine. The real question is how Horace got to this point in his adult life without anyone punching him in the throat, he grates on the nerves so. He goes so far over the top: his reactions to ordinary conversations are so odd and off-putting and inappropriate. You have to wonder if Horace is somewhere “on the spectrum” as they say today; a person who has a genuine problem relating and interacting with others due to a problem with brain chemistry.
Now, Horace is a sad, rather pathetic sort of character and I wanted to like him, but this performance fought me all the way. Here’s a fellow who is so disappointed in how his life has turned out, who has so little to look forward to, that he’s constantly lost in an idealized version of his own childhood. I wish the character had been played in a completely different manner. I would have made Horace rather melancholy and quiet, slightly vague, coming only to life with a happy grin (and NOT a manic screed!) when he remembered a bit of the past. Not quite as oblivious and anti-social as Robert Duvall was in “Miniature,” but perhaps in some ways a bit similar to that character. I think it would have worked very well, but the bombastic Horace as portrayed here is a constant irritant and the performance is too over-the-top to work for me.
So, I don’t know what to rate this, liking the story but disliking the acting… I think I'll settle on a 6---I'm knocking at least two points off for that performance.
As I was watching, I was trying to figure out to just which year in the past Horace was visiting; I finally guessed it must have been 1935. Afterwards I looked up the movie poster that is prominently displayed on the wall--- “O'Shaughnessy's Boy”---and sure enough, that film was released in 1935.
Haters gotta hate
Post a Comment